MFDJ 01/24/24: Disposing of Bodies

Today’s Tidy Yet Truly Morbid Fact!

To get away with gruesome murder again and again, a serial killer has to possess a fairly high degree of fiendish cunning. Snaring a victim is the first challenge he has to meet. Once he has perpetrated his atrocities, he is faced with another, even more pressing problem—what to do with the remains. The solutions of this grisly dilemma range from the straightforward to the diabolically elaborate.

Some serial killers simply leave their victims where they lay, occasionally taking the time to wreak some grotesque indignity on the remains.  For example, Albert DeSalvo, the “Boston Strangler,” liked to tie big ornamental bows around the throats of his female victims, as though he were leaving a gift-wrapped present for the police.

DeSalvo’s bizarre bow-tying practice made for an unmistakable “signature.” Understandably enough, many other homicidal maniacs prefer to leave no trace of their identities at all. For some sociopaths, the simplest approach to corpse disposal is the best. Ted Bundy, the Hillside Stranglers, and the Green River Killer, for example, simply dumped the bodies of their victims out in the open—in forests, along riverbanks, on the slopes bordering freeways. Others made perfunctory attempts at concealment, burying the bodies in shallow graves or shoveling dead leaves over the remains. John Wayne Gacy didn’t even bother to leave home. He simply stuck the dead bodies of his young male victims under the crawl space of his house—at last until he ran out of room, at which point he began tossing them into a nearby river.

By contrast, there are some serial killers who go to great lengths to obliterate every trace of their victims, often by immersing the bodies in acid, covering them with Quicklime, or incinerating them in ovens.

Then there are those serial killers whose disposal methods can best be described as wildly (if not insanely) unorthodox. Joe Ball, for example, got rid of his murdered mistresses by feeding their flesh to his pet Alligators, while the monstrous Fritz Haarmann chopped up his victims and sold their flesh to his neighbors, passing it off as black-market beef.

The longer a serial killer remains on the loose, of course, the more proficient he tends to become. With corpse disposal, as with most human skills, practice makes perfect. Special agents of the FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit describe one serial killer who was thrown into a state of almost panicky confusion when faced with the ravaged remains of his first victim. By the time he committed his second homicide, he had already worked out a sophisticated disposal method, taking four painstaking hours to dismember the body in his bathroom before bagging up the parts and depositing them in supermarket dumpsters.

Of course, there are some serial killers who prefer not to dispose of their victims at all. Both Dennis Nilsen and his American counterpart, Jeffrey Dahmer, were so desperate for companionship that they went to great, highly deranged lengths to keep the corpses close by. Of course, since both men occupied cramped apartments, even they had to face up to the fetid reality after a while and get rid of their rotting house guests. Nilsen’s solution was sublime in its simplicity, if not entirely practical—he chopped up the bodies and flushed the chunks down the toilet, a method that eventually led to his arrest when the plumbing in his apartment building became clogged with gobs of decomposing human flesh.


Jeffrey Dahmer victim

Culled from: The A to Z Encyclopedia of Serial Killers

 

Wretched Recommendations!


Dead Wake: The Last Crossing of the Lusitania

This book was an excellent read which is kind of an unnecessary thing to say because it’s a book by Erik Larson so of course it’s an excellent read! The book follows the pattern that Larson perfected in his masterpiece, The Devil in the White City, as he simultaneously follows two storylines: The tale of the German U-boat U-20 and the daily life of its crew, and the story of the passengers and crew aboard the luxury liner Lusitania. And much like Devil in the White City, I was surprised to find myself more interested in the story I initially thought would be boring: the tale of the U-boat. I now find myself fascinated with the idea of living on a submarine for weeks at a time. Just imagine it. Stale air filled with body odor, cooking smells, and diesel fumes. Crammed into quarters with no privacy, no fresh air, and knowing that there was a not small likelihood that you would die in that tube.

The story of the Lusitania was fascinating too, of course. There are two facts that will stick with me:
1) It only took 18 minutes for the Lusitania to sink. When I get up in the morning, it takes me about 15 minutes to get to work and I work from home. So in the time that it takes me to get up, pee, tell my cat how cute he is, get dressed, brush my teeth, tell my other cat how cute she is, walk downstairs, feed the cats, make a coffee, make a bowl of cereal, and go to my computer, the Lusitania is almost completely underwater. I can’t even imagine that kind of pandemonium. Well I kind of can because I just read about it. The one difference with the Titanic is that the water was balmy compared to the frigid ice water of the North Atlantic so at least some people were able to survive IF, and that’s a really big if, they didn’t put on their life jackets backwards. That’s something else I learned—never put your life jacket on backwards. It will hold you underwater.
2) Captain Turner, the doomed captain of the Lusitania, tried to go down with the ship by staying on the deck as it went down, but the ship spit him back up to the surface so he didn’t get the martyrdom of death he wanted and instead lived to be scapegoated by the incompetent – no, the murderous – military intelligence who knew fully well the U-boat was in that area and had already sunk several ships but did absolutely nothing about it. Presumably because they wanted the ship to sink so that the US would get involved in the war. Bastards! The captain certainly did not deserve the blame he received.
Altogether, this is another excellent read from Larson.  5/5

Andersonville Prisoner Diary Entry Du Jour!

This is the continuation of the 1864 diary of Andersonville prisoner Private George A. Hitchcock (see the archived version for all entries up until now).

Here’s today’s entry:

October 13th. More arranging and moving about. We now lie very compact; about three thousand men occupying about three acres, two thirds of which space is included in the streets. I have been peddling coffee at the hospital sheds, made from burnt meal.

Culled from: Andersonville: Giving Up the Ghost

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *